Human Impact Project

Carlos Rodelo, a 43-year-old from Barranquilla, Colombia, fled his home country after being repeatedly extorted and entered the U.S. through the Mexican border, where a federal judge granted him protection under the Convention Against Torture, barring his return to Colombia but not to a third country. Detained since August, Rodelo was held at the Alexandria, Louisiana airport and shackled without food by ICE agents despite his objections and a pending habeas corpus challenge, then flown via Dakar and Accra to the Democratic Republic of Congo as part of a Trump Administration third-country deportation agreement covering the first group of 15 Latin Americans. Rodelo, who has diabetes and other medical conditions, described feeling like a prisoner in Congo despite being told he was free, and stayed in a Kinshasa hotel hoping to be repatriated. The Department of Homeland Security asserted he had violated the terms of his parole. Rodelo later returned to Colombia through the International Organization for Migration's Assisted Voluntary Return program.

A self-represented noncitizen detainee was detained on April 21, 2026. The detainee filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention and seeking a bond hearing, arguing the detention violated due process as indefinite. ICE notified the court on July 14, 2026 of intent to remove the detainee on July 15, 2026. The court denied the detainee's emergency motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, finding the detainee failed to comply with Rule 65 procedural requirements and was unlikely to succeed on the merits given the scheduled removal date.

A 16-year-old identified as "Elias" in court filings was deported to Guatemala without a removal order or any attempt to obtain one, according to a pending lawsuit filed in the District of Columbia. His lawyers argue that "this removal was lawless: Defendants had no removal order for Elias, nor did they even attempt to obtain one." The case follows a similar pattern to Mario Mata Cruz's deportation and is part of a broader pattern documented by lawyers across the country of noncitizens being deported without final removal orders from immigration judges.

A man was released on his own recognizance in February 2024 after entering the United States. On April 18, 2026, ICE re-detained him without providing a pre-deprivation hearing. He filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for temporary restraining order challenging his detention. The court found that his prior release by immigration authorities created a liberty interest in his continued release and that his re-detention without a pre-deprivation hearing violated due process. The court granted his habeas corpus petition and ordered his immediate release on the same conditions he was subject to prior to his re-detention. The court also enjoined ICE from re-detaining him in the future without notice and a pre-deprivation hearing before an immigration judge, where ICE must prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to the community or a flight risk.

Laura Ramírez lost her 10-year-old daughter Emily in a hit-and-run accident. As a victim of crime cooperating with authorities, Ramírez was eligible for a U visa. However, she was detained by ICE agents during a scheduled immigration appointment despite having this protection, separating her from her remaining daughter.

M, a mother of six children and asylum seeker, is struggling to support her family after her husband and brother—the household's primary income earners—were apprehended by ICE without a warrant while traveling to a job site. Both men are detained and facing deportation. M is caring for her children alone, including three infants and one child with a complex blood disorder requiring regular medical care. M and her two school-age children are asylum seekers living in fear of their own detention. After three months, the family faces mounting bills with no income and M has exhausted her resources.

A transgender community health worker and member of the Transformative Justice Law Project was detained by ICE on April 15, 2026, in Maryland and later transferred to a detention facility in Louisiana. Granted Withholding of Removal in 2015, she has lived in the U.S. for nearly 40 years, has family in Chicago, and owns a home in Baltimore where she worked with transgender youth. She has a pending U-Visa application and a Habeas Corpus petition before a federal court, and her family has launched a fundraiser to cover legal fees and living expenses while she awaits release.

Ezequiel Vélez Cáceres, a 32-year-old Venezuelan physician, was detained by ICE at a Border Patrol checkpoint in Sarita, Texas on April 9, 2026, while traveling with his U.S. citizen spouse after his Temporary Protected Status (TPS) was cancelled. Vélez entered the U.S. legally in 2018 on a student visa to revalidate his medical credentials and had been working at a hospital in McAllen before resigning after losing TPS eligibility. He was in the process of obtaining a work visa when detained. On April 15, 2026, his immigration attorney appeared before a federal court judge arguing for his release. His attorney described him as "an example of the type of migrant our country should have," and the court ordered his release from the McAllen immigration detention center, despite prosecution arguments citing flight risk.

Two migrants—one from Cuba and one from Yemen—were deported to Eswatini on July 16, 2025, as part of a group of five men sent to the country. Roberto Mosquera, the Cuban, was arrested by ICE at a routine immigration check-in in Florida on June 13, 2025, and deported without notice. Both men have been imprisoned in Eswatini's Matsapha Correctional Centre in isolation with no charges filed and initially no legal representation permitted. Their attorney states they have already served their U.S. sentences and are being held indefinitely while awaiting repatriation. In April 2026, after nine months of detention, Eswatini's Supreme Court ruled they have the right to meet with a local lawyer, a right previously denied. Civil society organizations have threatened legal action challenging the legality of their detention under Eswatini law.

A noncitizen previously released on bond was re-detained by ICE on April 10, 2026, following notification that he had been convicted of driving under the influence on December 3, 2025. He had a prior DUI arrest in 2012 and was arrested again for DUI on June 14, 2024. The court ordered that Respondents provide him a bond hearing within fourteen days before an immigration judge, with the government bearing the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that he is a flight risk or danger to public safety. If no hearing is provided within fourteen days, he must be immediately released on the same terms as his previous release.

Four men from Cuba, Yemen, Laos, and Vietnam were deported by the U.S. to Eswatini in July 2025 under the Trump administration's third-country deportation program, despite having no connection to the country. As part of a $5.1 million agreement between the U.S. and Eswatini to accept deported migrants who cannot easily be returned to their home countries, the men were held at a maximum-security prison and denied in-person legal counsel for nine months. After the Eswatini government appealed a lower court's decision granting them access to a lawyer, the Eswatini Supreme Court ruled in April 2026 that the men have the right to meet with legal counsel, rejecting government claims that they showed no interest in representation. The men had completed their U.S. prison sentences but remained detained in Eswatini without being charged with any crime there.

Federal officials have detained or deported at least 25 people whose families were granted legal status under a 2023 court settlement stemming from the Trump administration's 2017 family separation policy. Among them is a 23-year-old Honduran man who had been legally living and working in the U.S. but has spent five months in ICE detention in Louisiana facing deportation. The government has violated key terms of the settlement by imposing a $1,000 per-person fee, halting payments to contractors assisting with family reunification, and detaining and deporting individuals meant to be protected under the court order. Government lawyers argue the settlement does not restrict their authority to carry out removal orders, while a federal judge in California has rebuked the administration's actions.

The Trump administration is detaining DACA recipients at increasing rates, treating them as deportable despite their protected status, and has moved to deport some to their countries of birth. The administration has also cut healthcare benefits for recipients, barred them from obtaining commercial driver's licenses, and a Board of Immigration Appeals ruling held that deferred action status alone is not enough for a judge to halt deportation. Renewal and work-permit processing that once took about 15 days now often takes six months or more, causing some recipients to lose jobs, while advocates say people have been detained during routine traffic stops and held far from their families for months.

A Venezuelan citizen who entered the U.S. in 2023 was granted withholding of removal to Venezuela in February 2025. On April 9, 2026, he was detained by ICE during a routine check-in. His wife was informed that authorities intended to remove him to Africa, despite his withholding protection. The court issued a habeas petition order requiring respondents to show cause why the petition should not be granted and ordered advance notice of any removal.

Hilda Sucely R.M.D.E., mother of two U.S. citizen children who lived in the U.S. for nearly 25 years, was arrested by immigration authorities on April 9, 2026, when she appeared for a fingerprinting appointment in connection with seeking relief under the Violence Against Women Act. She had been released on bond after entering without inspection in 2003 and had an in absentia removal order from September 2003 that she never received notice of. The court ordered her immediate release from immigration detention, finding violations of federal regulations requiring pre-deprivation process.

A Mexican national filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his immigration detention that has lasted nearly two years. The court found his petition unclear about whether he is detained under pre-removal or post-removal statutes. The court denied his motions for emergency relief and appointed counsel but ordered the government to respond and clarify the legal basis for his continued detention.

A Nicaraguan asylum seeker was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) without a prior hearing before a neutral decisionmaker. The court granted a temporary restraining order for his release and issued a preliminary injunction barring further detention without a pre-detention hearing. The court also prohibited transferring him out of the district without prior approval.

Nairoby Cabrera posted on Instagram requesting financial assistance for her son, Daniel Zamora, who is currently detained by ICE. The family is seeking funds to cover legal fees and immigration bond costs to provide him with adequate legal representation.

Ying-Hsi Chou, born in Myanmar and a Taiwanese citizen, moved to South Australia in 2012 to work as a fruit picker and faces deportation over a 2014 visa application error in which she failed to declare a previous visit to Australia. She is married to Ben, an Australian citizen who does not speak Mandarin, and they have three Australian-born children, including an eldest son worried about losing friends and changing schools. The family would struggle to resettle in Taiwan, and local community members have started a petition supporting Chou while her lawyer has appealed to the Immigration Minister for intervention. If deported, she must wait at least three years before reapplying for an Australian visa.

A Chinese national filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging his prolonged immigration detention without a bond hearing, arguing it violated due process rights. The government conceded that he was entitled to a bond hearing and agreed to bear the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that he poses a danger to the community or risk of flight. On March 26, 2026, the federal court granted his petition and ordered respondents to arrange a bond hearing before an immigration court within seven days. The court declined to order his immediate release or issue further declaratory or injunctive relief. He must pursue any request for attorneys' fees through a separate noticed motion.