Human Impact Project

A native and citizen of El Salvador who has resided in the United States since 2005. In 2014, an Immigration Judge ordered him removed but granted his application for withholding of removal to El Salvador. Because his removal order was not effectuated, he was placed under an Order of Supervision (OSUP) on February 2, 2016, and remained released on supervision while attending regular check-ins with ICE for approximately 10 years. On March 5, 2026, at a scheduled check-in, ICE revoked his OSUP and arrested him, providing only vague boilerplate language about enforcing his removal order without specifying concrete reasons or the destination country. The informal interview required by regulations occurred the same day as his arrest, preventing him from meaningfully responding to the revocation notice. On April 8, 2026, a federal judge granted his motion for a temporary restraining order, finding that ICE likely violated its own regulations by: failing to provide adequate notice of the reasons for revocation, conducting the informal interview immediately upon arrest without allowing time to respond, and having the revocation decision made by a Supervisory Detention & Deportation Officer rather than the required Executive Associate Director or District Director. The court ordered ICE to immediately release him under the same supervision terms that applied before his detention and enjoined ICE from re-detaining him unless it complies with proper procedures.

Over 1,100 Afghan refugees, many of whom served alongside U.S. forces, are at Camp As Sayliyah in Qatar. Since February 28, 2026, residents have experienced missile attacks and are housed in shipping containers. President Trump suspended their refugee resettlement program in 2025. The refugees remain in Qatar with unresolved immigration status.

An immigration detainee who entered the U.S. without inspection in December 2021 was initially detained then released on his own recognizance with restrictive conditions. After more than four years of compliance with all conditions, he was arrested and detained by immigration authorities on March 4, 2026, without notice or process. The court granted his habeas petition and ordered his immediate release, finding his detention violated constitutional due process rights. He was arrested and detained by immigration authorities on March 4, 2026, after previously being released under certain conditions. He filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his immigration detention as violations of due process and federal immigration law. The court granted his unopposed petition and ordered his immediate release under the same conditions as his prior release.

A noncitizen who had been previously released on bond or conditional parole was re-detained by immigration authorities on March 3, 2026. The court found that the Due Process Clause requires the government to provide a pre-deprivation bond hearing before a neutral arbiter when re-detaining someone who was previously released. The court ordered his immediate release with the same conditions he had prior to detention.

An immigration detainee who had previously been released on bond or conditional parole was re-detained on March 3, 2026. The court found that the government violated due process by re-detaining him without providing a pre-deprivation bond hearing before a neutral arbiter. The court ordered his immediate release with the same conditions he had prior to detention and required the government to provide seven days' notice and a proper hearing before any future re-detention.

Luis Muñoz Pinto, a 27-year-old Venezuelan man, was deported by the Trump administration to El Salvador's Cecot prison in March 2025. He was accused of gang membership based on rose tattoos he obtained to honor his twin sisters. U.S. immigration officials identified the tattoos as Tren de Aragua gang symbols. A federal court later ruled that Muñoz Pinto and over 100 other deported Venezuelans must be allowed to return to the U.S. for due process.

A man who entered the United States without inspection on October 3, 2022, was subsequently encountered by immigration authorities. DHS exercised its discretionary parole authority to formally parole him into the United States. On March 2, 2026, he was re-detained by ICE at Golden State Annex. He filed a federal habeas corpus petition on June 3, 2026, challenging his detention and seeking immediate release under the same conditions prior to re-detention, as well as procedures to prevent future re-detention without due process. On June 5, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California granted his petition, ordering his immediate release and enjoining ICE from re-detaining him absent exigent circumstances without providing notice and a pre-detention hearing before an immigration judge where the government must prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger or flight risk.

A Guatemalan citizen who entered the U.S. without inspection in October 2022 was detained by ICE on March 1, 2026 after encountering local law enforcement and admitting he had entered the country without inspection. This was his first encounter with ICE officials. A federal court ordered his immediate release, finding he could only be detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) rather than the mandatory detention statute the government cited.

A Chinese citizen who fled persecution for his political views and applied for asylum in 2022 was abruptly re-detained by ICE in March 2026 after complying with immigration reporting requirements for over three years. He had been released on parole since arriving in September 2022 and has no criminal history. The court granted a preliminary injunction ordering his immediate release, finding his re-detention without a pre-deprivation hearing violated due process rights.

A longtime resident, who has lived continuously in the U.S. since entering without inspection in 2004, was arrested and detained by immigration officers on his way to work in March 2026. The court granted his habeas corpus petition in part, finding he is entitled to a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) since he is not subject to mandatory detention as an arriving noncitizen. The court ordered respondents to provide him a bond hearing before a neutral decisionmaker within seven days.

An immigrant previously released on bond or conditional parole was re-detained by immigration authorities on February 27, 2026. The court found that his re-detention violated due process because the government failed to provide a pre-deprivation bond hearing before a neutral arbiter. The court ordered his immediate release with the same conditions he had prior to detention. A second immigrant previously released on bond or conditional parole was re-detained on March 1, 2026. The court found that the government violated due process by re-detaining him without providing a pre-deprivation bond hearing before a neutral arbiter. The court ordered his immediate release with the same conditions he had prior to detention.

Cynthia Raygoza, Sandra Carmona Samane, and Ashleigh Brown were federally charged after livestreaming themselves following an ICE agent from Downtown Los Angeles to his home in Baldwin Park on August 28, 2025, then shouting his identity to neighbors and allegedly posting his address online. They were indicted on conspiracy and federal agent-doxxing charges, each carrying up to five years in prison per count. At trial, jurors acquitted all three of the doxxing conspiracy charge after evidence showed they did not know they were following the agent home and never actually disclosed his address during the livestream. Two of the women were instead convicted of stalking, a charge their attorney called an unprecedented application of federal law, and now face up to five years in prison. The agent testified the incident led his family to move and his son to leave his high school, though Baldwin Park police confirmed there were no repeat incidents, injuries, or weapons involved, and the agent acknowledged relatives still reside at the property.

A widowed undocumented Mexican mother describes losing her husband, Jesús Juárez Cruz, after he avoided seeking medical care due to fear of ICE deportation. The man died without receiving medical treatment. The widow, who requested anonymity due to concerns about Trump administration retaliation, shared her story through an Instagram post and news article.

Anselmo Martin Matias, who had been released on $16,000 bond in 2019 during withholding proceedings, was detained by ICE on February 24, 2026, during his routine check-in. ICE told him he was being detained for "breaking the rules" due to his March 2025 guilty plea to reckless driving, which they incorrectly described as driving under the influence. The federal court ordered his immediate release, finding that due process requires a hearing before a neutral arbitrator when someone is re-detained based on alleged supervision violations.

A Nicaraguan man has been in immigration detention since February 24, 2026, after being arrested at a scheduled ICE check-in. ICE did not set bond and did not provide him with a custody review by an immigration judge as required under the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision in Matter of Yajure Hurtado. A recent DHS policy classifies anyone arrested within the United States and charged with being inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A)(i) as an 'applicant for admission' subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), a change from prior policy that allowed for bond or conditional parole under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). He filed a habeas corpus petition and ex parte application for a temporary restraining order seeking to prohibit his removal, transfer outside the Central District of California, and continued detention without a constitutionally adequate bond hearing. The federal court granted the temporary restraining order, ordering respondents to either provide him an individualized bond hearing before an immigration judge pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) on or before April 7, 2026 at 9:00 a.m., or release him from custody by April 7, 2026 at 5:00 p.m. The court set a hearing on the preliminary injunction for April 16, 2026.

Two Haitian girls, ages 4 and 5, were found dead in a septic tank at Casa Hogar Patos, a migrant transit center in Oaxaca, Mexico on February 24, 2026. The children had been admitted to the facility with their mother while awaiting immigration processing. The Support Group for Repatriated and Refugees (GARR) is demanding an investigation. Two officials have been dismissed but no one has been formally held responsible.

An ICE whistleblower testified before Congressional Democrats during a public forum titled "Our Values at Stake Pt. III: Terrorizing Communities Without Warrants and No Restraint." The whistleblower discussed concerns about defective training practices within the agency.

Ricardo del Pino Olivera, a 67-year-old Cuban man, was deported from the United States to Mexico on July 3, 2025, after serving a 17-year sentence. On July 31, he applied for refugee status in Mexico but struggled to find formal employment or access essential services. The Amparito shelter in Villahermosa began advocating on his behalf, after which he gained access to advanced medical treatment. He was repeatedly hospitalized beginning December 12, and by early January he was severely malnourished and still lacked legal documentation. Ricardo died on February 21, 2026. His death certificate listed his nationality as 'unknown.'

A man who entered the United States in October 2014 was detained by ICE on February 21, 2026, as he was leaving his home to go to work. The detention occurred without any warning, paperwork, or stated legitimate reason. The federal court granted his habeas corpus petition and ordered his immediate release, while also enjoining ICE from re-detaining him without providing notice and a pre-detention hearing.

A man entered the United States on June 1, 2019, was initially detained at the border by immigration authorities, and was released on bond after eight months in custody. On February 20, 2026, he was re-detained by ICE. The federal court granted his habeas corpus petition and ordered his immediate release on the same conditions he had prior to re-detention.