ProPublica finds wide disparities in how fast courts rule on immigrant detention challenges
Sep 3, 2026

A ProPublica analysis of more than 70,000 habeas corpus petitions filed since January 2025 found that federal courts vary dramatically in how quickly they rule on whether immigration detainees are being unlawfully held. Courts in Mississippi and Louisiana, where some of the country's largest ICE detention facilities are located, have typically taken three months or more to decide cases, while courts in California, Texas, Florida, and Minnesota have resolved cases within weeks. Attorneys and advocates say the delays leave detainees waiting in prisonlike conditions, with some accepting deportation or voluntary departure rather than continue waiting for a ruling. Judges have used varying approaches, including standing orders, borrowed judges, and streamlined bond hearing procedures, to manage the surge in filings, while some courts, such as Mississippi's Southern District, have left the bulk of cases with a single judge amid mounting backlogs.
Sources
Related incidents
- ICE bans hugs at California's largest detention center, separating families behind glassSep 4, 2026 · California City, CA
- Lawyers mobilize to free nearly 1,900 immigrant children held for months without parentsSep 3, 2026
- Congressman probes reported ICE surge in Indianapolis amid local pushbackSep 3, 2026 · Indianapolis, IN
- Judge blocks Trump's new birthright citizenship restrictions after Venezuelan mother's caseSep 2, 2026
- ICE arrests hit record highs in mid-2026, most detainees have no criminal recordSep 2, 2026 · San Diego, CA
- Trump administration ends protections for 350,000 Haitians while resettling white South African refugeesSep 2, 2026